Class Notes

Welcome to Touro Law! Over the next few weeks, we will be updating the blog with tips to assist you in making a successful transition to law school.

One of the first questions that new law students ask is what should be included in class notes - below are things to consider:

Going to class and actually listening to your professor is one of the most important steps in the learning process. Make sure to listen to what is being said, and to how it is said. Also, pay attention to vocabulary and write down every legal term of art. Your goal in class is to learn to speak the language of the law.

While in class, your notes are to capture what occurred on a particular day, allowing you to relive what was covered (cases discussed, questions asked, comments made, etc.). Taking notes in law school will be different than notes you have previously taken; you’re not expected to make a transcript of each class, which begs the question, what should you write? Below are a few pointers of what should be in your notes:

• Points, questions, and observations your professor makes about the cases. Pay attention to how your professor “thinks” about a case, which is quite different from the basic information you already have in your case briefs.

• All the questions the professor asks in class. Remember, with some professors, all you get are questions and it is a huge mistake to overlook the questions while waiting for “answers” (because "answers" are not likely to come). The answers may even be the questions because the answers you’re looking for are in the questions that the professor asks of you and the material. In these cases, your job will be to learn to ask the same types of questions - soon you’ll be the one asking the questions, finding the problems in the case, and the inconsistencies in the court’s reasoning.

• Write down every hypothetical and example. These hypotheticals are often reincarnated on final exams -consider every hypo as a potential exam question and write it down, and don't forget to write down the variations, too - professors are known to present one problem and then change the facts.

• Comments relating to policy, legal theory, and doctrine. These are tips to how your professor thinks about the law, and how you should be learnig to think about it.

• Everything written on the blackboard, dry erase board, presented in a PowerPoint presentation, etc. Law professors are traditionally so “low-tech” that even writing on the board is a major event - when it happens, you can be sure it’s important.

• Legal terms: As discussed previously, since your job is to learn the language of the law, make sure you write down the words, phrases, and legal terms of art associated with the topics as they are discussed.

• Steps of analysis; tests; standards: This is not the same as the “black letter rule.” That’s in your casebook, the hornbook, and every commercial outline. What we are talking about is the way your professor presents the rule to you and the way she works through the sequence of analysis. Listen for such signal language as “there are two questions to be asked” or “the patterns to look for are. . .” When you hear these clues, you’ll be able to detect that your professor is about to give you the guides for your analysis. Write it down.

Now is also a great time to mention Professor Darrow-Kleinhaus' book, Mastering the Law School Exam - you will find pointers like these and more there. Mastering the Law School Exam is going to be a great resource for you throughout your academic career, not just for exam prep, but all aspects of your legal education.

Top Three Do's and Don'ts for Taking Notes

Top Three Do's and Don'ts for Taking Notes

Don’ts
1. Don't write down everything the Professor and students have to say. Remember this is NOT college. We do not require you to regurgitate, word for word, the professor’s brilliant speeches - we want you to solve problems.

2. Don't, on the other hand, space out and not take a single note. Last year, we had a student who did not do very well his first semester. We had occasion to observe him in class where he spent most of his time, reading his cases. He didn't take a single note during the entire 50 minutes!

3. Do try to separate out the relevant information from the irrelevant. What is relevant? Think back to IRAC (Issue Rule Application Conclusion) - we want to continually focus on IRAC as our problem solving technique - therefore you should take notes in three general categories:

Dos
Case Brief - During class most professors will take you through each case and in that process they are taking you through the legal problem solving method - FIRAC (Facts, Issue Rule Application) or IRAC (Issue Rule Application Conclusion). At this time you want to correct your case brief - your brief is your attempt to understand how the court solved the problem in that case - your first order of business should be to check your brief for mistakes. Make sure you identified the relevant facts. Did you include too many facts? Too little? Did you get the correct issue? Rule? Listen for statements made in class that explain or define the rules in your brief. The note might be a better statement of the rule, or a new rule that has developed since your case. Were you able to identify the court's rationale (and understand the application)? Be harsh on yourself. Do not say, well, that's not quite it, but I was close. Precision matters in law school. Listen closely and edit your brief extensively.

Hypotheticals and examples - After discussing a case, your professor may change the facts or present a hypothetical situation - if so you want to write this information down. Hypos are additional examples of how to solve problems using IRAC - when the facts change or when you are given a new set of facts; you need to go through IRAC to solve the problem. Here the issue and the rule may be the same (as the one discussed in the case at hand) but the application or reasons why the outcome is the way it is will be different (because of the difference in the facts). Hypos and the reasoning or rationale are examples of the application part of IRAC and you should write these down to study later for the exam. Again, the law school exam does not test you on whether you really remember a case inside and out. Instead, it will test your ability to take a rule you've learned and apply it to different facts. So, when your Professor poses hypotheticals, she's doing just that - she's taking the rule you learned in a case and is asking you to apply it to a different set of facts. You should treat hypotheticals like mini-exam-like questions posed by your professor. All hypos should be written down.

Other stuff
Magic words. Some legal concepts, which take many words to explain, can be summed up in one word or phrase, for example, proximate cause or constructive eviction. When you hear one of these words or phrases used in class, write it down. These are magic words. They can be legal terms of art (res ipsa loquitor) or terms a professor uses to refer to a concept (victimless crimes). You will get points on the exam if you know what these terms mean and can use them correctly. So write them down and look them up later if you need to.

Review. Some professors begin or end the class with a summary of what happened last time. WRITE THIS DOWN. This review will be an invaluable guide to how the Prof. wants a problem to be analyzed. ORDER MATTERS. Legal analysis is very orderly. Elements must not only be analyzed separately, but in a certain order. Make sure you know both the elements, and the order of analysis.

Other Stuff (there is always more). Finally, the professor may also discuss different topics that seem unrelated to the case. These include things like social policy, insurance concerns (who pays for what) or whether this issue should be decided by the courts or the legislature. In these instances you need to stay focused and try to think - how does this relate to IRAC - how can this information help me solve another legal problem in the future (i.e. on the exam)? Does this information concern the rule? Will social policy change the rule? Does it concern the application of the rule? Are there other reasons, besides the facts, that should make the court find differently? You should think about this information, jot it down and try to make some connection to IRAC and the problem solving method.

By Charlotte D. Taylor, Assistant Dean for Student Services at Touro Law and co-author of Bridging the Gap Between College and Law School: Strategies for Success (Carolina Academic Press 2001, 2009)

(Updated) Law School Shorthand

We have gotten a lot of feedback about how helpful the prior shorthand post has been when preparing for class and taking notes in class. Below, we have added additional abbreviations to the list. As mentioned in the prior post, there is not a right or wrong way to do things, but making use of these abbreviations can be a time saver.

Π or P – plaintiff
∆ or D - defendant

Aff’d - affirmed
Rev’d - reversed

TC - Trial Court
AC - Appellate Court
Cir. - Circuit Court(s) of Appeals (i.e. 2d Cir.)
COA - Court of Appeals
DC - District Court
SC or SCt - Supreme Court

admin. - administrative (or administration)
alt. - alternative
Ame – Amendment
ans – answer
arb - arbitration (arbitrator)
arg. - argument
AE – assignee
AR – assignor
Ass'n - association
a/r - assumption of risk
atty - attorney
auth - authority

BR or bankr. - bankruptcy
bc or b/c – because
B – beneficiary
Bd. - board
BFP – bona fide purchaser
BoP or b/p – burden of proof (or bill of particulars)

CB - casebook
cent - central
CA - class action
CE - collateral estoppel
CL – common law
co. - company
CP – condition precedent
CS – condition subsequent
Cong. - Congress(ional)
cx - consideration
Con. – constitutional(ity)
K - contract(s)
CNeg - contributory negligence
© or (c) - copyright
Corp. – corporation
c-c - counterclaim
Ct. - court
cx-c - crossclaim

def. - defense
dem – demurrer
dept. or dep't - department
diff – different
disc or discrim - discrimination
dist. - district
div - division

EE – employee
ER – employer
Emp - employment
Ev – evidence

Fed – Federal
FRCP - Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
FRE - Federal Rules of Evidence

g/r or GRULE – general rule
gov or gov’t - government

HDC – holder in due course
H – husband

Inc. - incorporated
indem - indemnity (indemnify)
indep - independent
ins - insurance
Int'l - international

JMOL - judgment as a matter of law
JNOV - judgment notwithstanding the verdict
j/t – joint tenant
J - judgment
Jdx or jurisd - jurisdiction

L - landlord
l/c - letter of credit
liab - liability
ltd - limited
LLC - limited liability company
LLP - limited liability partnership
lit or litig - litigation

Maj. – majority
Min. - minority
MPC - Model Penal Code
MTD - motion to dismiss

Neg. – negligence
No. - number

OE – offeree
OR – offeror
op. - opinion
O - order
org. - organization

p’ship - partnership
PJ - personal jurisdiction
p/f – prima facie
PE – promisee
PR - promisor
Prop – property

Rxn – reaction
RE or R/E - real estate
® - registered trademark
reg(s) - regulation(s)
Req’d - required
R, R2 - Restatement of Law, Restatement Second
Rev - review
RAP – Rule Against Perpetuities

§ or s - section
SHolder or S'holder - shareholder
St – state
Std – standard
SoL – statute of limitations
SoF – statute of frauds
SL – strict liability
SMJ - subject matter jurisdiction
SJ - summary judgment

TRO - temporary restraining order
T - tenant
TP or 3rd P – third party
TPB or 3rd PB – third party beneficiary
™ or TM - trademark
Tr. - trustee

Unif. - uniform
UCC – Uniform Commercial Code
USC - United States Code

v - versus

W - wife
w/ - with
w/in - within
w/o - without

Law School Shorthand

When taking notes in class, do you use shorthand? Much like everything else, there is no one right or wrong way to do things, but making use of abbreviations can be a time saver.

Below are some helpful abbreviations:

∏ or P- plaintiff
∆ or D- defendant

Aff’d- affirmed
Rev’d- reversed

TC- Trial Court
AC- Appellate Court
DC - District Court
SC or SCt - Supreme Court

Ame – Amendment
ans – answer
arg. - argument
AE – assignee
AR – assignor
a/r - assumption of risk
atty - attorney

bc or b/c – because
B – beneficiary
BFP – bona fide purchaser
BoP or b/p – burden of proof

CL – common law
CP – condition precedent
CS – condition subsequent
cx - consideration
Con. – constitutional(ity)
K- contract(s)
Corp. – corporation
Ct. - court

dem – demurrer
diff – different
disc or discrim - discrimination

EE – employee
ER – employer
Emp - employment
Ev – evidence

Fed – Federal
FRCP - Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
FRE - Federal Rules of Evidence

g/r or GRULE – general rule
gov or gov’t - government

HDC – holder in due course
H – husband

JNOV - judgment notwithstanding the verdict
j/t – joint tenant
J - judgment
Jdx or jurisd - jurisdiction

L - landlord

Maj. – majority
Min. - minority
MTD - motion to dismiss

Neg. – negligence

OE – offeree
OR – offeror

p’ship - partnership
PJ - personal jurisdiction
p/f – prima facie
PE – promisee
PR promisor
Prop – property

Rxn – reaction
Req’d - required
R, R2 - Restatement of Law, Restatement Second
Rev - review
RAP – Rule Against Perpetuities

§- section
St – state
Std – standard
SoL – statute of limitations
SoF – statute of frauds
SL – strict liability
SMJ - subject matter jurisdiction
SJ - summary judgment

TRO - temporary restraining order
T - tenant
TP or 3rd P – third party
TPB or 3rd PB – third party beneficiary

UCC – Uniform Commercial Code

v - versus

W - wife
w/ - with
w/in - within
w/o - without

Update: additional abbreviations have been added here.

Class Notes

Going to class and actually listening to your professor is one of the most important steps in the learning process. Make sure to listen to what is being said, and to how it is said. Also, pay attention to vocabulary and write down every legal term of art. Your goal in class is to learn to speak the language of the law.

While in class, your notes are to capture what occurred on a particular day, allowing you to relive what was covered (cases discussed, questions asked, comments made, etc.). Taking notes in law school will be different than notes you have previously taken; you’re not expected to make a transcript of each class, which begs the question, what should you write? Below are a few pointers of what should be in your notes:

• Points, questions, and observations your professor makes about the cases. Pay attention to how your professor “thinks” about a case, which is quite different from the basic information you already have in your case briefs.

• All the questions the professor asks in class. Remember, with some professors, all you get are questions and it is a huge mistake to overlook the questions while waiting for “answers” (because "answers" are not likely to come). The answers may even be the questions because the answers you’re looking for are in the questions that the professor asks of you and the material. In these cases, your job will be to learn to ask the same types of questions - soon you’ll be the one asking the questions, finding the problems in the case, and the inconsistencies in the court’s reasoning.

• Write down every hypothetical and example. These hypotheticals are often reincarnated on final exams -consider every hypo as a potential exam question and write it down, and don't forget to write down the variations, too - professors are known to present one problem and then change the facts.

• Comments relating to policy, legal theory, and doctrine. These are tips to how your professor thinks about the law, and how you should be learnig to think about it.

• Everything written on the blackboard, dry erase board, presented in a PowerPoint presentation, etc. Law professors are traditionally so “low-tech” that even writing on the board is a major event - when it happens, you can be sure it’s important.

• Legal terms: As discussed previously, since your job is to learn the language of the law, make sure you write down the words, phrases, and legal terms of art associated with the topics as they are discussed.

• Steps of analysis; tests; standards: This is not the same as the “black letter rule.” That’s in your casebook, the hornbook, and every commercial outline. What we are talking about is the way your professor presents the rule to you and the way she works through the sequence of analysis. Listen for such signal language as “there are two questions to be asked” or “the
patterns to look for are. . .” When you hear these clues, you’ll be able to detect that your professor is about to give you the guides for your analysis. Write it down.

Here is also a great time to mention Professor Darrow-Kleinhaus' book, Mastering the Law School Exam - these pointers are derived from there. Mastering the Law School Exam is going to be a great resource for you throughout your academic career, not just for exam prep, but all aspects of your legal education.